(1) This Policy is currently under review as part of the Unit and Course Management System (UCMS) project. To the extent of any inconsistency, the Unit and Course Management System http://staff.scu.edu.au/ucms/ takes precedence over the contents of this Policy.
(2) This Chapter addresses matters related to the quality and integrity of the planning and approval process for academic courses offered by the University. It also deals with the internal quality and integrity of the courses themselves and how they fit with University policies and the University's strategic directions and current Academic Plan. It describes the processes which apply throughout the life cycle of a course, dealing with conception and approval, introduction, change and possible removal.
(3) The Vice Chancellor normally addresses matters related to the financial viability of, and resource issues related to, a course. However, where these affect the quality of the course offering the Academic Board will also consider such matters and advise the Vice Chancellor.
(4) This Chapter is intended to assure and enhance the quality, integrity and relevance of the academic courses of the University by establishing policy and processes for the rigorous development and consideration of all academic courses offered by the University - from conception, approval and introduction to changes and possible removal.
(5) All course documentation relating to new course concepts, approvals, changes or removals must come from the School Board /College Board to the Secretary, Academic Board or the Deputy Vice Chancellor (DVC) as appropriate. All financial documentation must come from the Head of School /Head of College.
(6) School Boards /College Boards shall be responsible for recommending new course developments for consideration by the Academic Board or Council.
(7) All courses that are in a new discipline area for the University shall be approved by Council.
(8) All other new course proposals shall be approved by Academic Board.
(9) The Academic Board or Council and the Deputy Vice Chancellor shall require advance notice of an intention by a School Board /College Board to proceed with a new course development.
(10) All new course developments shall require that a New Course Concept Proposal and an Initial Resource Statement be developed. The New Course Concept Proposal shall contain, amongst other things, the proposed members of the Course Development Team, and an approval and implementation timetable (which may change in the New Course Accreditation Master File).
(11) With approval of the New Course Concept Proposal marketing and entry in relevant publications may be possible with the approval of the DVC.
(12) Following approval of the New Course Concept Proposal a new course development shall also require production of a New Course Accreditation Master File and a Full Resource Statement as appropriate.
(13) A Course Development Team is to be formed to write the New Course Accreditation Master File.
(14) This Team shall be approved by the DVC.
(15) A new course shall not be delivered until the DVC has confirmed that the course fits with the University's strategic direction and current Academic Plan; has confirmed the economic viability of the course; and the University Council or the Academic Board, as per delegations, has approved the New Course Accreditation Master File.
(16) The Academic Board may request to view the Full Resource Statement.
(17) School Boards /College Boards shall be responsible for recommending changes to courses for consideration by the Academic Board or its delegated sub-committee.
(18) A course change shall require production of a Transitional Course Amendments Template and, where prescribed by the Deputy Vice Chancellor, a Resource Statement.
(19) A changed course shall not be delivered in its new form until the course change submission has been approved and, where relevant, the DVC has confirmed the economic viability, and the Director, Student Services has confirmed the viability of the implementation schedule of the revised course.
(20) A major change to a course may not be made in the year prior to a School Review, unless:
(21) See http://staff.scu.edu.au/ucms/.
(22) Where the proposal has come from a Head of School /Head of College or Pro Vice Chancellor, the School Board /College Board shall be responsible for recommending the removal of a course. It shall then for forwarded for consideration by Council through the Academic Board.
(23) The DVC must be informed of the proposed removal of the course to ascertain that this action does not adversely affect the strategic directions or current Academic Plan of the University and that this action complies with ASCED requirements.
(24) Where the proposal comes from the Deputy Vice Chancellor or Vice Chancellor the Submission will go directly to Accreditation Committee for noting and forwarding to Academic Board and Council for approval.
(25) The removal of a course shall require production of a Course Removal Template.
(26) A course removal shall not be acted upon until the Deputy Vice Chancellor: has confirmed that the removal of the course does not adversely affect the strategic directions or current Academic Plan of the University; that the removal of the course meets ASCED requirements; and the University Council has approved the Course Removal Template.
(27) See http://staff.scu.edu.au/ucms/.
(28) In all instances, School Boards /College Boards shall provide the Academic Board or Council, as per delegations, with a clear justification for introducing a new course, or for making changes to an existing course. They must also justify the proposed removal of a course.
(29) These statements shall form part of the relevant submission. The Academic Board or Council shall consider all submissions from the standpoint of the quality of the learning experience for existing or prospective students; their alignment with existing University policies, strategic directions and the Academic Plan. Academic Board shall not normally consider resource issues unless they affect the quality of the course offering and may request to see the Full Resource Statement.
(30) In exceptional circumstances, as defined by the Chair, Academic Board, the Chair may waive some or all of this Chapter after appropriate consultation. This consultation will include, where relevant: Director, Teaching and Learning, Director, Student Services, Director of Marketing, Course Production Unit, DVC, Director, Library Services and Copyright Officer and Director, Technology Services. ASCED and other requirements will still have to be met.
(31) A course shall not be offered until the DVC has approved the related Full Resource Statement and confirmed the financial viability of the proposal.
(32) Approval for the use of award and unit nomenclature is given by Academic Board and then, where appropriate, Council through the course planning and approval process.
(33) Generic award titles should normally be used. However, specific award titles may be requested. In this case, and in conjunction with the Course and Unit Nomenclature Guidelines, the proposed title must be justified by addressing the following matters:
(34) Normally study areas are designated by majors and these will be described on the testamur and not in the name of the award. In exceptional circumstances, approved by the Vice Chancellor and the Chair, Academic Board, a study area may be added to the generic award title, as a descriptor. Where a descriptor qualifies a generic title, the descriptor will appear in parentheses. Examples of this very limited usage are Bachelor of Applied Science (Forestry), Bachelor of Education (Secondary). Where this occurs these are separate awards.
(35) Award abbreviations should be consistent within the discipline area and School/College.
(36) They should also be readily recognisable, but at the same time as short as possible.
(37) Unit titles should reflect the content of the unit and fit within a sequence of units in a course.
(38) Unit codes are allocated in sequence by Student Services and do not relate to the content of the unit, the year of offering or the course.
(39) Undergraduate courses will as far as possible comply with the following principles:
(40) It is recommended that an Academic Advisory Committee be established for each award or suite of awards, both undergraduate and postgraduate, offered or during the development of a new course at the University.
(41) The Academic Advisory Committee could also operate as a School/College Advisory Committee with an expanded brief to consider other issues such as resources, facilities, staffing and the interrelationships between courses.
(42) The role of the Academic Advisory Committee is to provide informed advice to the relevant Head of School or Head of College.
(43) The suggested terms of reference for the academic component of an Academic Advisory Committee are:
(44) Possible membership: