Comments

Document Feedback - Review and Comment

Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document

How to make a comment?

1. Use this Protected Document to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.

2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.

3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.

4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.

 

Important Information

During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will receive a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:

  1. DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.

  2. DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.

  3. DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.

  4. DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.

 

Academic Staff Teaching Qualifications and Equivalent Professional Experience Procedures

Section 1 - Purpose and Scope

(1) These Procedures establish how the University ensures that academic staff appointed to teach students enrolled in coursework courses are qualified to an appropriate level in the relevant discipline, as required by legislation.

Scope

(2) These Procedures apply to all current and prospective academic staff, including casual academic staff, who teach students enrolled in coursework courses and units, including those practicums/placement units and delivered through the University's educational partnerships.

(3) These Procedures do not apply to guest lecturers.

Top of Page

Section 2 - Definitions

(4) The Definitions (Academic) Policy applies to this Policy.

Top of Page

Section 3 - Policy Statement

(5) Academic staff will normally have a qualification at least one Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) level higher than the course they teach.

(6) Due to the level of academic leadership required, Course Coordinators, Unit Assessors, and Associate Dean (Education)s, must meet clause (18) requirements.

(7) In some fields of education (for example, those which are professionally focussed, emergent academic disciplines or highly professional specialist subjects within a discipline), academic staff may be deemed suitably qualified based on a combination of their AQF qualifications and professional experience equivalence.

(8) Professional experience equivalence to teach in coursework courses may be established based on consideration of:

  1. Teaching experience, scholarship activity and a range of professional experience;
  2. The minimum academic qualifications;
  3. Any specific criteria for assessing equivalence at each AQF level.

(9) The eligibility of teaching staff is assessed against the criteria set out in clause (18).

(10) Where a staff member does not meet all criteria specified in clause (18) the following applies:

  1. The staff member must be supervised for one academic year equivalent by an appropriate senior academic who takes responsibility for assuring the quality of teaching in the unit and providing mentorship; and
  2. Supervision includes moderation of marked work.
  3. At the end of this period the supervisor will decide if the staff member has met the requirements for teaching coursework units and will consult with Human Resources, if required. 

(11) Depending on the role being recruited for, Course Coordinators, Discipline Chairs, Associate Dean (Education)s or Executive Deans/College Deans will be responsible for assessing qualifications and approving equivalent professional experience and recording their determinations in UCMS. 

(12) In cases whereby a staff member does not have AQF+1 and they meet criteria in clause (18), the delegated approver will provide written confirmation of how the staff member meets the criteria including the evidence that was assessed. The approver is responsible for keeping accurate records.

(13) Executive Deans/College Deans are responsible for  ensuring all teaching staff are qualified to the standards set out in these Procedures and that the Faculty or College maintain appropriate records.

(14) For educational partners, the Academic Director, or equivalent, is responsible for ensuring all teaching staff are qualified to the standards set out in these Procedures. The Educational Partnership Manager is responsible for keeping accurate records of all staff approvals.

Monitoring and Reporting Requirements

(15) Annually, BIQ will report to the Academic Standards and Quality Committee on the incidences where the eligibility of teaching staff is based on their professional experience equivalence.

Top of Page

Section 4 - Qualifications and Equivalence Requirements

(16) Academic staff who are assessed on a combination of formal qualifications and professional experience should have formal qualifications at least the same level as that being taught. Professional experience will only be used to assess one AQF Level above that being taught and professional experience must be current and relevant to area being taught.

(17) In the case of nested courses, the academic staff member must meet the AQF+1 or equivalent requirements for the highest course in the nested arrangement, or be subject to meeting conditions of clause (10).

(18) The criteria below are considered minimum requirements and Faculties, Colleges and Educational Partners may require additional evidence or standards.

 
Course AQF 
Qualification Level being taught 
Minimum AQF Qualification of Staff
in same or cognate discipline  
Professional Experience Equivalence Criteria 
Level 5 
Diploma
Level 7
Bachelor Degree 
No equivalence recognised
Level 6 
Associate Degree
Advanced Diploma 
Level 7
Bachelor Degree
No equivalence recognised
Level 7 
Bachelor Degree
Level 8 
Bachelor Honours Degree 
Graduate Certificate
Graduate Diploma 
AQF Level 7 qualification (Bachelor degree) and current registration or equivalent to practise within the relevant profession (if relevant) plus either:
a)   3 years relevant professional experience in the last 5 years; or
b)   enrolment in an AQF Level 8 or above program plus relevant professional experience in the last 5 years, totalling 3 years. 
Level 8
Bachelor Honours Degree
Graduate Certificate
Graduate Diploma 
Level 9 
Master Degree 
AQF Level 8 qualification and current registration or equivalent to practise within the relevant profession (if relevant) plus either:
a)   5 years relevant professional experience in the last 10 years; or
b)   enrolment ina relevant AQF Level 9 (Master) or above program plus relevant professional experience in the last 10 years, together totalling 5 years. 
Level 9
Master by Coursework 
Level 10
Doctorate 
AQF Level 9 qualification and current registration or equivalent to practise within the relevant profession (if relevant) plus either:
a)   5 years relevant professional experience in the last 10 years; or 
b)   enrolment in a relevant AQF Level 10 (doctoral) program plus relevant professional experience in the last 10 years, together totalling 5 years. 

Evidence to support professional experience equivalence

(19) Any verifiable source of relevant evidence may be considered in determining the weight and value of the professional experience. This includes, but is not limited to, evidence of:

  1. Current registration or equivalent to practise within the relevant profession (if relevant);
  2. Leadership in the development of professional standards;
  3. Performing in a role that requires high order judgment and the provision of expert advice, or roles at a senior level;
  4. Managing significant projects in the field;
  5. Testimonials, awards or other recognition that recognises leadership or expertise in the field;
  6. Contribution in the field through participation in advisory boards and professional networks;
  7. Peer reviewed publications;
  8. Other publications such as books, reports and artistic works;
  9. Leadership or management of research acknowledged by peers;
  10. Teaching experience including teaching at lower AQF levels, delivery of professional development or public lectures.