Comments

Document Feedback - Review and Comment

Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document

How to make a comment?

1. Use this Protected Document to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.

2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.

3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.

4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.

 

Important Information

During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will receive a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:

  1. DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.

  2. DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.

  3. DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.

  4. DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.

 

Terms of Reference - Human Research Ethics Committee

Section 1 - Purpose

(1) The Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) is a committee of the Vice-Chancellor, responsible for the review of human research conducted under the auspices of Southern Cross University in accordance with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2023). The Committee operates within the portfolio of the Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor, who provides executive oversight. 

(2) The HREC: 

  1. Reviews research proposals that involve higher risk; meet criteria in the National Statement for submissions that require HREC review; or are escalated to the HREC by the Low Risk Committee or HREC Secretariat.
  2. Ensures research proposals align with the principles of research merit and integrity, justice, beneficence, and respect, as outlined in the National Statement.
  3. Operates independently in decision-making, ensuring ethical review processes are conducted with integrity and in accordance with the National Statement.
Top of Page

Section 2 - Responsibilities

Ethical Review of Human Research 

(3) The HREC reviews human research proposals to determine whether they are ethically acceptable, considering:

  1. Alignment with the National Statement’s principles: research merit and integrity, justice, beneficence, and respect.
  2. Assessment of risks and benefits to ensure risks are minimised, mitigated or managed, and justified by the benefits of the research.
  3. Suitability of consent processes, including fair recruitment; voluntary, informed, and appropriately documented consent; appropriate dissemination of research outcomes; and appropriate protections for participants' data.

Monitoring Approved Research 

(4) The HREC oversees the ethical conduct of approved human research through ongoing monitoring. Researchers must adhere to approved ethics protocols and report any modifications or breaches. The Committee receives periodic updates on monitoring activities and compliance matters:

  1. Annual research progress reports
  2. Requests for changes of protocol
  3. Requests for renewal of ethics approval
  4. Reports of unexpected adverse events, as well as suspensions or withdrawals of approval for non-compliant projects.
Top of Page

Section 3 - Membership

(5) The HREC is constituted in accordance with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2023), Paragraph 5.1.30. A properly constituted quorum must include members from each of the following categories and comprise a minimum of eight members:

  1. Category A: A chairperson with suitable experience, including previous membership of an HREC, whose other responsibilities will not impair the HREC’s capacity to carry out its obligations under the National Statement.
  2. Category B: Two people who bring a broader community or consumer perspective and who have no paid affiliation with the institution.
  3. Category C: A person with knowledge of, and current experience in, the professional care or treatment of people; for example, a nurse, counsellor, or allied health professional.
  4. Category D: A person who performs a pastoral care role in a community including, but not limited to, an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander elder or community leader, a chaplain, or a minister of religion or other religious leader.
  5. Category E: A qualified lawyer, who may or may not be currently practicing and, where possible, is not engaged to advise the institution on research-related or any other matters.
  6. Category F: Two people with current research experience that is relevant to research proposals to be considered at the meetings they attend.

(6) The HREC maintains appropriate diversity and expertise by:

  1. Aiming, as far as practicable, for gender diversity at each meeting and for at least one- third of members at each meeting to come from outside of the University (National Statement, 2023, 5.1.36).
  2. Seeking external advice on specialised matters when necessary while retaining responsibility for final decisions.
  3. Including representation from Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander communities where relevant to the research under review, in accordance with National Statement requirements (NS5.1.39).

(7) The HREC may nominate a Deputy Chair from among its members (NS 5.1.32). The Deputy Chair supports the Chair in ensuring the efficient operation of the Committee, may preside over meetings in the Chair’s absence.

Meetings

(8) Meetings will be conducted in accordance with the Standing Orders – Human Research Ethics Committee.