View Current

Higher Degree Research Candidate and Supervision Policy - Professional Doctorate

This is not a current document. It has been repealed and is no longer in force.

Section 1 - Purpose and Scope

(1) The purpose of this Policy is to specify the responsibilities of Professional Doctorate Candidates and Supervisors, and to provide a clear set of parameters within which Supervisors and Candidates may negotiate the details of research and supervision.

Scope

(2) This Policy applies to Professional Doctorate Candidates, Professional Doctorate Supervisors, and Schools and Special Research Centres (SRC) involved in Professional Doctorate candidacy.

Top of Page

Section 2 - Definitions

(3) For the purposes of this Policy:

  1. Candidate:
    1. a person who (a) has been accepted for admission to, or is enrolled in a Professional Doctorate offered at, or in conjunction with, Southern Cross University;
  2. Close Personal Relationship:
    1. one which gives rise to a real or potential conflict of interest and includes relatives, spouses (including de facto spouses), and financial relationships;
  3. Co-ordinating Supervisor:
    1. a Supervisor of a Professional Doctorate Candidate studying through an Off-Shore partner institute, who is responsible and accountable for the administration of Supervisory process (e.g. completion and submission of progress reports, appointment of examiners, etc.). This Supervisor must be a staff member of Southern Cross University (either continuing or with a minimum fixed term contract of two (2) years);
  4. Co-Supervisor:
    1. a Supervisor who shares workload responsibility, in terms of the research and research supervision, as the Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor. This Supervisor would be involved in, and contribute to, Candidate milestones such as progress reports, proposals, etc. A Co-Supervisor may have a greater workload contribution than the Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor if he or she is more appropriate for the supervision of the project but may not fulfil the role of the Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor. Note, External Supervisors who are appointed as Adjuncts for the purpose of supervision are considered Co-Supervisors;
  5. Higher Degrees Research Committee (HDRC):
    1. the HDRC is the advisory committee to the Academic Board on issues of Higher Degrees Research (HDR) Rules, Policy, Procedure, Guidelines and training across the University;
  6. Primary Academic Supervisor:
    1. a Supervisor for a Professional Doctoral Candidate who is responsible and accountable for the Candidate's supervision, and who normally has a majority load of supervision. Where a Co-Ordinating Supervisor is not included on the Supervisory team, this Supervisor must be an academic staff member of Southern Cross University (either continuing or a minimum fixed term contract of two (2) years);
  7. Professional Doctoral Supervisor:
    1. a Supervisor for a Professional Doctoral Candidate who shares workload responsibility with either the Co-Ordinating or Primary Academic Supervisor. This Supervisor would be involved in, and contribute to, Candidate milestones such as progress reports, proposals, etc. This supervisor may have a greater workload than the Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor if he or she if more appropriate for the supervision of the project but may not fulfil the other supervisory role. This Supervisor does not necessarily need to be research active, but they will have relevant expertise and experience, and may act in a consultative capacity rather than a supervisory capacity where appropriate.
  8. School or Special Research Centre Director of Higher Degrees Research Training (SDHDRT):
    1. a School or Special Research Centre (SRC) Director of Higher Degrees Research Training is the individual appointed in each School/SRC who is dedicated to managing and facilitating the Higher Degrees Research program. Each SDHDRT is a member of the University's Higher Degrees Research Committee (HDRC);
  9. Supervisor:
    1. A Co-Ordinating Supervisor, Co-Supervisor, Primary Academic Supervisor, or Professional Doctoral Supervisor.
Top of Page

Section 3 - Policy Statement

(4) The University shall ensure appropriate supervision for all Professional Doctorate Candidates in all Schools and Special Research Centres.

Top of Page

Section 4 - Procedures

Part A - Responsibility of the University

Office of Research

(5) The Office of Research shall:

  1. adhere to the University's standards for admission and requirements for the particular degree as established by the Academic Board;
  2. ensure adequate and accurate information is provided prior to enrolment;
  3. ensure induction and orientation procedures are followed by Supervisors and Candidates;
  4. make available to each Candidate at enrolment:
    1. the relevant policies, including this document and the Research Responsible Conduct Policy , and Specific Award Rules governing the appropriate degree; and
    2. general guidance for all aspects of candidature, including the thesis examination process, and outlining in particular the University's expectations for research higher degrees;
  5. make available to each Supervisor, a copy of the relevant policies, including this document, Research Responsible Conduct Policy , and the Rules governing the appropriate degree;
  6. ensure all Supervisors are aware of the necessity to implement the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, and are aware, where applicable, of the working procedures of the ethics committees;
  7. ensure provision is made for professional development of Supervisors and potential Supervisors;
  8. provide reasonable opportunities for Candidates and Supervisors to make representations as appropriate;
  9. subject to Academic Board approval, ensure there are appeals procedures setting out the grounds on which, and means whereby, Candidates may appeal against the conduct and outcome of the examination and evaluation of their candidature;
  10. take measures to protect the intellectual property arising from the work of Candidates in accordance with the University's Intellectual Property Rights Policy;
  11. administer progress reporting requirements and monitor their effectiveness, with additional care taken for international candidates;
  12. ensure the views of both the Candidate and Supervisors may be represented adequately through progress reporting;
  13. provide clear guidance for examiners, outlining the University's expectations for the particular award;
  14. maintain confidentiality of the examination process;
  15. ensure no Supervisor is appointed as a Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor unless they have supervised a Candidate to completion (including Masters by Research candidates), or successfully completed the Higher Degrees Research Supervision unit in the Graduate Certificate of Academic Practice, or equivalent;
  16. ensure no Primary Academic, Co-Ordinating, or Co-Supervisor is appointed unless they hold a qualification equivalent at AQF level 10;
  17. ensure no candidate currently enrolled in their first Research Doctorate degree be added as a Supervisor for a higher degree research Candidate; and
  18. where the Candidate is an international student, ensure at least one Supervisor is located at the campus where the Candidate is undertaking the majority of their study.

Responsibility of the Higher Degrees Research Committee

(6) The Higher Degrees Research Committee shall be responsible for:

  1. approving the appointment of Supervisors prior to the commencement of a degree; and
  2. appointing appropriate supervision if the Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor is to be temporarily absent in excess of a period of four weeks, or if the Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor leaves the University.

Responsibility of the School/SRC:

(7) Schools and Special Research Centres shall:

  1. ensure that reasonable space, facilities, and resources are made available to Candidates, as appropriate to the field of study;
  2. maximise the likelihood of the Candidate's success by ensuring that:
    1. the applicant is eligible and qualified for admission to candidature;
    2. the applicant has demonstrated capacity to undertake the program in the required amount of time;
    3. the proposed research is appropriate and feasible for the degree;
    4. information is available to prospective Candidates about the research interests and academic experience of academic staff;
    5. the Candidate has appropriate supervision (including a minimum of two Supervisors) at all times; and
    6. Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisors are actively carrying out research and publishing in the Candidate's relevant discipline area; and that there is a clear relationship between the proposed project and the proposed Supervisors;
  3. ensure the workload of Supervisors allows sufficient time for adequate supervision of the Candidate, and the allocation of other workload and obligations are taken into consideration;
  4. address unsatisfactory progress or delays in progress reporting or confirmation of candidature promptly and appropriately, in consultation with the Deputy Pro Vice Chancellor (Research) and Director of the International Office, where appropriate;
  5. recommend to the HDRC appropriate supervision arrangements if the Principal Supervisor is to be temporarily absent in excess of a period of four weeks, or if the Principal Supervisor leaves the University;
  6. ensure confirmation of candidature committees are established to assess the performance of the Candidate against the compulsory criteria and within the required time period;
  7. ensure mechanisms are in place to promote regular consultation, interaction, and development of productive intellectual relationships between the academic unit's staff and Candidates;
  8. address any conflicts that may arise between Supervisors and Candidates, and ensure they are resolved in an appropriate and timely manner;
  9. ensure a positive research culture and scholarly environment within Schools and SRCs is promoted for the benefit of Candidates;
  10. when the Candidate is an international student, adhere to the requirements of the Education Services for Overseas Students (ESOS) Act and associated legislation, including the National Code of Practice for Registration Authorities and Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2007;
  11. in accordance with the Code of Conduct, declare and minimise any potential conflicts of interest between candidates and supervisors by ensuring:
    1. no supervisor is in a Close Personal Relationship with the candidate;
    2. no Coordinating Supervisor or Primary Academic Supervisor is a direct manager of a candidate who is a permanent employee of the university;
    3. any supervisory panel consisting of supervisors who are in Close Personal Relationships must have a third supervisor appointed; and
    4. if any circumstances arise during the candidature relating to the above potential conflicts of interest, ensure that consequential changes are made to the supervisory team.

Responsibility of the Supervisors:

(8) Supervisors of Candidates shall:

  1. be approved by the HDRC prior to the commencement of the thesis units;
  2. have a thorough understanding of the University's current Rules, Policies, Procedures and Guidelines in all areas of enrolment, so that accurate advice and appropriate support is given to the Candidate;
  3. in accordance with the Code of Conduct, declare the existence of, or the potential for, a conflict of interest, in relation to any candidate under their supervision or proposed for supervision;
  4. participate in Supervision workshops as required by the University;
  5. as their main role, provide academic support throughout the candidature to enable the Candidate to achieve a high standard of research activity and output;
  6. establish and maintain an agreement for the frequency of meeting with the Candidate. This Supervisor Candidate Agreement shall be negotiated prior to enrolment, and should be reviewed throughout the duration of the candidature. If a new Supervisor is appointed, or Supervisory roles change, the Supervisor Candidate Agreement must be reviewed and a new Agreement signed and submitted. If a Supervisor will be away for an extended absence, or if a Supervisor is retiring, he or she must advise the Candidate and School/SRC Director Higher Degrees Research Training;
  7. monitor the performance of the Candidate relative to the standard required for the degree, and ensure that inadequate progress, or work below the standard expected, is brought to the Candidate's attention and documented, and the Candidate is given an opportunity to improve. Where international candidates are involved, the ESOS and National Code requirements must be met, or reported to the Deputy Pro Vice Chancellor (Research) and Director of the International Office. The Supervisors shall help with developing solutions to problems as they are identified. Continuing unsatisfactory progress must be reported to the School/SRC Director Higher Degrees Research Training, and formally advised to the Candidate; and
  8. support Candidates to develop the Graduate Attributes as appropriate to research degrees, and should strongly encourage, where appropriate, the publication of the results of the Candidate's research.

(9) The Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor has the main Supervisory responsibility for the Candidate, and is responsible for directing the work of the Candidate and for ensuring that the Candidate meets all administrative and academic requirements. The Primary Academic or Co-Ordinating Supervisor located in the School/SRC in which the Candidate is enrolled, must:

  1. undertake administrative roles and general oversight associated with Candidate's academic progression, including comment and sign off of Candidate progress reports and Confirmation of Candidate reports;
  2. be a mentor for any Co-Supervisors, where appropriate;
  3. help the Candidate plan the research program;
  4. provide the Candidate with project management strategies where transparent goals and expectations for the research are articulated;
  5. ensure the Candidate obtains any necessary Ethics approvals to conduct the research;
  6. confirm the thesis is properly presented and conforms to the University's Rules, and that the work is of a suitable standard for examination;
  7. recommend potential Examiners to the Higher Degrees Research Committee at least three (3) months prior to the submission of the work;
  8. ensure that the names of the Examiners are not disclosed to the Candidate prior to the submission of the thesis, nor released after the examination process is completed, unless agreed to by the Examiners;
  9. provide support to the Candidate, in consultation with the other supervisors, to respond to examination reports;
  10. ensure reports are made regularly as required on the Candidate's progress; and
  11. Co-Ordinating Supervisors are required to spend four (4) days, twice a year, with the partner institution, to work with candidates, supervisors, and administrative staff to ensure development and compliance.

Part B - Responsibility of the Candidates

(10) Candidates have primary responsibility for the undertaking, active pursuit, and completion of the research. Candidates shall:

  1. undertake Orientation as soon as possible after commencing candidature;
  2. familiarise themselves with the processes and practices of candidature in particular, and Southern Cross University's Rules, Policies and Procedures more broadly;
  3. in accordance with the Code of Conduct, declare the existence of, or the potential for, a conflict of interest, in relation to any appointed or proposed supervisors;
  4. negotiate an agreement of work to be done and schedules to be adhered to with Supervisors, and to review this agreement throughout the candidature;
  5. maintain regular contact with the Supervisor(s) and ensure that a reasonable timetable of meetings and submitted work is agreed and maintained;
  6. submit, with assistance from Supervisors, any Ethics Applications required for the research to take place;
  7. complete confirmation of candidature and additional requirements as set by the Higher Degrees Research Committee, at the required time;
  8. present required written material in sufficient time to allow for comments and discussions before scheduled meetings;
  9. complete progress reports as required by the University;
  10. accept responsibility for the preparation of the final copies of the thesis, and to submit a thesis which meets the University's requirements on presentation and content;
  11. comply with University policies on academic integrity and academic misconduct, authorship and with the Research Responsible Conduct Policy;
  12. use the resources and facilities available in a timely and responsible manner to facilitate progress on the research project;
  13. participate in activities that will enable the Candidate to acquire or improve the skills and knowledge required for completion of the research project;
  14. adopt safe working practices relevant to the field of research and adhere to the University's Work Health and Safety Policy;
  15. adhere to research practices as set out in the Australian Code of the Responsible Conduct of Research;
  16. follow appropriate ethical practices appropriate to the relevant discipline, and seek further clarification where required;
  17. maintain continuous enrolment, or seek approval for leave of absence or interruptions when necessary;
  18. advise their Supervisors of any significant factors which may affect their progress and, in consultation with Supervisors, initiate any variations to candidature as required;
  19. document the progress of the work and present written or other material for comment, feedback, and discussion in a timely manner to allow for continuity of the research program;
  20. advise the Research Training Unit of, or apply for in the prescribed manner, any changes to conditions of enrolment;
  21. after consultation with their supervisors, advise the Research Training Unit three months prior to the intended submission date of intent to submit their thesis;
  22. prepare the thesis for examination, including arrangements for its proofreading, printing, and binding;
  23. work with the Supervisors and School/SRC Director Higher Degrees Research Training on Step 1 and Step 2 Tables of Changes following the examination of the thesis, and provide the Research Training Unit with all requested materials following the recommendation of award of degree;
  24. where the Candidate is an international student, ensure the degree is completed within the timeframe of their Confirmation of Enrolment.

(11) See Also:

  1. The Australian Code of the Responsible Conduct of Research
  2. The Education Services for Overseas Students Act
  3. The National Code of Practice for Registration Authorities and Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students (National Code)
  4. The Tertiary Education Quality Standards Agency Act
  5. Complaints Policy - Students and Members of the Public
  6. Intellectual Property Rights Policy
  7. Occupational Health and Safety Policy
  8. Research Responsible Conduct Policy
  9. Specific Award Rules
Top of Page

Section 5 - Guidelines

(12) Nil.