(1) This policy provides the framework for Southern Cross University's Multi-Badged Degree arrangements with Collaborating Institutions in Australia and internationally. (2) This Policy applies to all staff involved in the development of Multi-Badged Degrees. (3) 'Collaborating Institution' means an educational provider with which Southern Cross University has established, or proposes to establish, a Multi-Badged Degree award. (4) 'Multi-Badged Degree' (MBD) means a course taught by two or more education providers, including Southern Cross University, leading to the conferral of an undergraduate, postgraduate or doctorate degree. (5) 'Higher Degrees by Research (HDR) Candidate Collaboration Agreement' means a formal arrangement, negotiated and agreed between a HDR candidate, the University and a Collaborating Institution, for the provision of a MBD. (6) 'Higher Degree Research (HDR) Candidate Concept Proposal' means a HDR Candidate Collaboration Agreement which is in draft form and has not been agreed or signed by all parties or their nominated representatives. (7) 'Home Institution' means the primary coordinating institution that provides the greater share of supervision and other resources throughout candidature, and where the student spends most of their time. (8) 'Strategic Collaboration Agreement' means a formal MBD arrangement, applicable to all suitably qualified candidates within a defined period of time, negotiated between the University and a Collaborating Institution. (9) 'Strategic Concept Proposal' means a MBD plan which, if approved, would provide a MDB opportunity to all suitably qualified candidates within a defined period of time. (10) 'University' means Southern Cross University. (11) The University shall develop and deliver Multi-Badged Degrees (MBD) in collaboration with educational providers which are: (12) MBDs shall: (13) Multi-Badge Degree's: (14) Strategic Concept Proposals shall be developed according to the University's Course and Unit Accreditation Policy and must demonstrate (using additional documentation as necessary) that: (15) Strategic Concept Proposals must be presented to the Vice Chancellor's Group for consideration of approval. (16) Upon gaining approval for a Strategic Collaboration Proposal from Vice Chancellor's Group: (17) At a minimum, the negotiated draft CA must establish agreed: (18) In accordance with TEQSA requirements, MBDs between Australian institutions must be awarded on a single testamur bearing the crests and authorising signatures of all providers. For MBDs involving international institutions, either the award of a single testamur or two separate testamurs may be provided for in the Collaboration Agreement. In the latter case, appropriate wording must be placed on both the academic transcript and the testamur of each institution must transparently detail that the degree was awarded pursuant to a Multi-Badged Degree. (19) Subject to clause (20), HDR Candidate Concept Proposals shall be developed by the candidate, proposed Supervisor, and other relevant members of the Faculty or College with which the candidate will study, according to the HDR Candidate Collaboration Agreement Template at Schedule 1. (20) Where the Home Institution is not Southern Cross University, the Senior Deputy Vice Chancellor in conjunction with the Pro Vice Chancellor (Academic Innovation) may approve the use of the Collaborating Institutions documentation in lieu of the HDR Candidate Collaboration Agreement Template, if satisfied the documentation supplies all the information required by the HDR Candidate Collaboration Agreement Template. (21) Subject to clause (22) and (23), HDR Candidate Concept Proposals must be presented to the Senior Deputy Vice Chancellor for consideration of provisional approval. (22) Where an international Collaborating Institution is proposed, the Senior Deputy Vice Chancellor may consult with the Pro Vice Chancellor (Academic Innovation) before granting or declining provisional approval . (23) Provisional approval of a HDR Candidate Concept Proposal may only be granted where the: (24) Where provisional approval is obtained, the proposed candidate's relevant Executive Dean, College Dean, or Director Special Research Centre shall seek the proposed Collaborating Institution's formal agreement to the University's terms as contained in the HDR Candidate Collaboration Agreement. The agreement shall not be valid until signed by all parties or their nominated representatives. An Executive Dean, College Dean or Director, Special Research Centre may not, unless otherwise indicated within the HDR Candidate Collaboration Agreement Template, alter the terms and conditions of the Collaboration Agreement without prior consultation and approval of the Legal Office in conjunction with the Senior Deputy Vice Chancellor. (25) Nil. (26) This policy draws substantially on the paper 'Joint Badging of Coursework Degrees' published by Melbourne University, 2005. "http://www.unimelb.edu.au/Council/minutes/Attachments/apps0805.pdf"Multi-Badged Degree Policy
Section 1 - Purpose & Scope
Scope
Section 2 - Definitions
Section 3 - Policy Statement
Top of PageSection 4 - Procedures
Part A - Strategic Proposals and Agreements
Strategic Concept Proposals
Strategic Collaboration Agreements
Part B - HDR Candidate Proposals and Agreements
HDR Candidate Concept Proposals
HDR Candidate Collaboration Agreement
Section 5 - Guidelines
Section 6 - References
View Current
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
shall in consultation with the University's Legal Office lead on the negotiation of a draft Collaboration Agreement (CA) with the Collaborating Institution prior to the proposal's consideration by Student Administration Services, the Commercial Activities Committee, the Academic Board, and then the final approval authority as defined by the Delegations Rule and Schedules.