(1) This Policy: (2) This Policy applies to all coursework Awards offered by the University. (3) The following definitions apply for the purpose of this Policy: (4) The University acknowledges that learning can take place outside the formal education system, and that recognising Formal, Informal and Non-Formal learning supports an individual’s lifelong learning goals. (5) The overarching principle of this Policy is to preserve the integrity and distinctiveness of the University's Awards while recognising an Applicant’s Prior Learning. (6) Within this principle, the University also aims to: (7) The assessment of Prior Learning for the purposes of awarding Credit will be evidence-based, equitable and academically defensible. The precise nature of the evidence-based assessment may vary from discipline to discipline and assessments will be made on the merit of each individual case. The Recognition of Prior Learning by the University will usually reduce the required Volume of Learning for a Course. (8) The University may, at its discretion, set additional requirements for the Recognition of Prior Learning, including testing, interviews, and portfolio submission. More information about the criteria for assessment of Prior Learning is available in the Assessing Recognition of Prior Learning Applications Procedure. (9) Eligibility for Credit towards a Course does not guarantee admission to that Course, as there may be other entry requirements that have not been met or Course places may be limited. (10) Eligibility for Credit does not change English language requirements. (11) Professional accreditation and registration requirements may impact on whether Credit is available for some Courses. (12) Credit will not be granted for units completed within an enabling (or bridging) program, except where that program is part of a course of study accredited by the University. (13) Credit will not be granted for the research component of 3 + 1 year or embedded Honours awards. (14) Students will not be granted credit in a postgraduate unit for learning previously attained in an undergraduate course/qualification/award, except: (15) Credit will not be granted for prior formal and non-formal learning in units for which an individual received an outcome other than competent, satisfied requirements, or a Pass Grade (or equivalent) or higher. (16) Credit granted for prior learning does not contribute to the calculation of a student's grade point average (GPA). (17) Units for which credit is granted are not used in GPA calculations for purposes of considering student progress or the award of academic medals or prizes. (18) If a student transfers from one Southern Cross University Course to another, Credit approved for the original Course may not automatically transfer to the new Course due to professional accreditation / registration or other discipline-specific requirements. (19) Exceptions to this are: (20) Students are encouraged to seek advice on this when applying for internal Course transfer and may be required to re-apply for Credit in the new Course. (21) Block Credit, where the Applicant’s Prior Learning is assessed as being at an appropriate Level and standard relevant to the University’s offerings and meeting the Learning Outcomes for a group of units. (22) Unspecified Credit, where the Applicant’s Prior Learning is assessed as being at an appropriate Level and standard relevant to the University’s units offered as electives. (23) Specified Credit, where the Applicant’s Prior Learning is assessed as meeting the Learning Outcomes for a specific unit, or units. (24) Prior Learning that has been attained within ten years of the date of application for Credit will generally be considered current. (25) Where Applicants request Credit for formal or non-formal learning completed more than ten years of the date of application, they must establish that their studies have provided the basis for continuing and more recent learning in a relevant field. (26) Courses subject to the requirements of external professional accreditation bodies may require more recent Prior Learning. (27) Prior Learning will be considered relevant where there is evidence to demonstrate that the Applicant has achieved a standard of learning comparable to the level of the learning outcomes of the Award. (28) Prior Learning will be considered relevant for the granting of Block Credit where there is evidence that: (29) Prior Learning will be considered for the granting of Unspecified Credit at a particular Level where there is evidence to demonstrate that: (30) Prior Learning will be considered for the granting of Specified Credit where there is evidence to demonstrate that: (31) The maximum external Credit allowed towards a Southern Cross University Award will be determined by the requirement that the student complete a minimum amount of the Award at Southern Cross University. (32) The minimum study requirements at Southern Cross University are as follows: (33) The Pro Vice-Chancellor (Academic Quality) may approve awarding Credit in excess of those set out in the Minimum Requirements based on a mapping of Unit Learning Outcomes and recommendation by the Course Coordinator. These determinations are to be reported to Academic Standards and Quality Committee. (34) Limits on maximum Credit as set out above do not apply to approved Southern Cross University Nested Awards. (35) Credit may be rescinded at the request of the Applicant prior to, or after, Course commencement. (36) Rescission of Credit after Course commencement must be academically justified. (37) Credit will not be rescinded for the purpose of extending an Applicant's duration of study. (38) Credit cannot be rescinded for a unit successfully completed, or for a pre-requisite where the post-requisite unit has been successfully completed. (39) Credit may also be rescinded by the University in the following circumstances: (40) The rescinding of Credit awarded to international students studying in Australia will be managed in accordance with the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018, Part B, Standards 2 and 10. (41) An Applicant may appeal a decision regarding the assessment of Prior Learning or the rescission of Credit. (42) Grounds for an appeal are limited to procedural error or breach of procedural fairness. (43) Appeals must be in writing and submitted to the relevant Associate Dean (Education)for determination. (44) All appeals must be submitted within ten working days of the determination notification to students. (45) The University will safeguard the quality of its Awards by ensuring that: (46) Records of all Credit decisions must be maintained in Student One and include the following information, as a minimum: (47) The following roles and responsibilities are allocated under this Policy and its supporting Procedures. (48) The following Procedures support implementation of this Policy:Recognition of Prior Learning Policy
Section 1 - Purpose and Scope
Purpose
Scope
Section 2 - Definitions
Top of Page
Section 3 - Policy Context
Top of PageSection 4 - Policy
Internal Course transfer
Section 5 - Types of Credit
Currency
Relevancy
Block Credit
Unspecified Credit
Specified Credit
Minimum Study Requirements at Southern Cross University
Rescission of Credit
Appeal
Section 6 - Quality Assurance
Top of PageSection 7 - Records Management
Top of PageSection 8 - Roles and Responsibilities
Top of Page
Role
Responsibility
Assessing Recognition of Prior Learning
Senior Manager, Student Management
Determine requests for rescission of Credit, seeking advice from Course Coordinators as relevant.
Articulation Arrangement
Section 9 - Procedures
View Current
This is the current version of this document. To view historic versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
Academic Board
Set Southern Cross University Minimum Study Requirements
Academic Board
Amend Southern Cross University Minimum Study Requirements
Pro Vice-Chancellor (Academic Quality)
Grant Credit in excess of the SCU Minimum Study Requirements
Report Credit granted in excess of the SCU Minimum Study Requirements to Academic Standards and Quality Committee
Academic Standards and Quality Committee
Receive Report on Credit granted in excess of the SCU Minimum Study Requirements
Director, Student Administration Services
Resource and oversee training for Student Administration Services staff assessing applications for RPL
Discipline Chair/Associate Dean (Education)
Ensure academic staff assessing applications for RPL are trained and supported.
Student/Prospective Student
Apply for RPL
Apply to rescind Credit
Request review of an RPL Determination
Associate Dean (Education)
Consider and determine a request to review a decision re awarding or rescinding credit
Student Administration Services (Client Services)
Assess RPL request
Assess Rescind Credit request
Determine RPL request if in precedent data base
Determine Rescission of Credit request, where appropriate.
Direct Credit requests to Faculty/College as required.
Record Faculty/College decision and rationale to data base
Maintain RPL Credit Database
Record keeping – updating student records decisions and reason for decision
Notify students of determination
Course Coordinators – Faculty/Colleges
Where not covered in precedent data base, assess request for RPL by mapping learning outcomes to unit/course.
Advise Student Administration Services/Admissions of determination and reason for determination
Proposer of Articulation Arrangement
Conduct due diligence
Prepare submission
Seek endorsement of proposer
Submit to Discipline Chair for endorsement
Discipline Chair
Support/require changes/reject proposed Articulation Arrangement
Ensure academic staff involved in making determinations are adequately trained and are aware of policy requirements
Executive Dean
Approve/require changes/reject proposed Articulation Arrangement
Communicate Decision to Proposer and Student Services
Approve continuation of an Articulation Arrangement
Student Administration Services (Client Services)
Record Articulation Arrangement on RPL Credit Database
Course Coordinator
Monitor academic progression of student cohort of Articulation Arrangement and report to Academic Quality Standards Committee
Review Articulation Arrangement 6 months prior to its expiry and recommend continuation/discontinuation to Exec Dean
Academic Standards and Quality Committee
Review reports on academic progress of student cohort in Articulation Arrangements
Course Coordinators
Prior to commencing course/unit changes, consider impact on existing Articulation Arrangements.
Office of Business Quality Intelligence
Conducts periods reviews on decisions to award credit